Dasemu
1e7e9a3c13
Removes the client-side half of the remote CRDT sync protocol left after
the worker-side deletion in 565c211: RTC/remote-graph UI (components/rtc/*,
db/rtc/debug_ui.cljs, cloud-graph upload/download/leave/delete flows in
components/repo.cljs and mobile/components/app.cljs), E2EE UI and handlers
(components/e2ee.cljs, handler/e2ee.cljs, handler/events/rtc*.cljs), the
db-worker-node ui-request RPC (handler/worker.cljs's :db-worker/ui-request,
which existed only to serve E2EE password prompts), settings panels for the
legacy custom sync-server URL, and the now-orphaned :rtc/* client state
(presence UI, upload/download progress, remote-graph lists) — presence.cljs
was already deleted in the worker-side pass, contrary to the plan's "keep"
list, so all of this had zero producers left and was fully inert.
Also fixes several dead thread-api invokes discovered on LIVE paths that
would throw at runtime rather than being merely dead UI:
- db/restore.cljs's restore-graph! (called on every graph load)
- persist_db.cljs's <ensure-remote! (the Fase 3/4 daemon connect path)
- persist_db/browser.cljs's worker init and shutdown
- handler/user.cljs's logout
Verified via full compile of all 5 shadow-cljs targets (app, electron,
mobile, db-worker-node, test — 0 warnings) and a full bb dev:test run:
every namespace passes except the same 7 frontend.persist-db-test failures
that reproduce identically on unmodified HEAD (confirmed via git stash),
pre-existing network-sandbox flakiness unrelated to this change.
Known follow-up, not yet done: a handful of harmless-but-vestigial :rtc/*
references remain (handler/user.cljs's storage/graph-count exceed-limit
events, handler/events.cljs's :rtc-download? opt, worker/state.cljs's
*db-sync-config atom, worker/handler/graph.cljs's get-rtc-graph-uuid reused
by handler/editor.cljs's quick-add filter) — none throw or affect behavior,
left for a future pass rather than risk removing something still load-bearing
without deeper tracing. deps/db-sync/ (the Cloudflare Worker) is also still
untouched, per the plan's explicit note that it needs separate, larger surgery.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
11 KiB